Full Report

Know the Business

Greggs is a vertically integrated, value-led food-on-the-go specialist that bakes its own product, runs its own logistics and operates its own shops — a UK retail operation with the cost discipline of a manufacturer. The economic engine is small-ticket, high-frequency footfall (a £3 sausage roll sold across 2,739 shops, every weekday) where the company makes money on volume, scale of own-label production, and prime real-estate density. The market is currently underestimating two things: how punishing 2025–26 will be for ROCE as £287m of supply-chain capex peaks against only +2.4% like-for-like sales, and how fast that ROCE can re-rate once Derby and Kettering come online and capex collapses to £150–170m by 2028.

How This Business Actually Works

Greggs is a baker that owns the shops. Every Sausage Roll, Steak Bake and pizza slice is produced in one of the company's own bakeries (Newcastle, Balliol, Leeds, Birmingham, Treforest, plus the new Derby site coming online in H2 2026), shipped through its own radial distribution network, and sold through 2,739 mostly-leased shops. About 75% are company-managed — generating £1.9bn of the £2.15bn FY2025 revenue — and the rest are franchised in roadside, transport-hub and forecourt locations where partners like Moto, Roadchef, Applegreen and EG Group bring real-estate access Greggs cannot easily replicate. Franchised shops contribute via wholesale of finished product and commission, surfacing as the £254m business-to-business line that grew 9.2% in 2025 versus 6.5% in company-managed shops.

The unit economics are deceptively narrow but reliably profitable. A new shop costs around £430k to fit, and Greggs targets a 25% cash return on that investment, typically achieved within two to three years and often exceeding 30% at maturity. Gross margin sits stubbornly at 61–63% because the company manufactures rather than buys finished product — meaningfully higher than the typical QSR — but distribution and selling costs (rent, rates, shop labour, energy, lease depreciation) absorb 47–48 percentage points of revenue, leaving an underlying operating margin oscillating between 8% and 10% in normal years. People are 39% of the cost base and food/packaging another 33%, so the two macro variables that move the P&L are UK wage inflation (+8.3% in 2025 thanks to National Living Wage and employer NIC) and commodity input costs.

Where it really makes money is operating leverage on incremental volume. The bakeries and distribution centres are largely fixed-cost; once a tray of sausage rolls is being baked, baking another tray costs almost only flour, fat and pork. So the marginal contribution from a hot afternoon's footfall, an evening pizza-box order or an extra shop on a forecourt drops disproportionately to operating profit. Conversely — and this is what hit 2025 — when company-managed like-for-like volumes go negative (footfall down because of the heatwave in June/July, plus a consumer-confidence drag), the same fixed-cost network produces -4% operating profit on +6.8% sales. The other amplifier of the model is App-driven frequency: the loyalty App was scanned in 26.7% of company-managed transactions in 2025, up from 20.1% in 2024, giving Greggs a CRM data layer it never had — and which it is now monetising through Greggs Quests gamification and personalised "Baked for You" offers.

What truly drives incremental profit is the gap between three structural growth levers and two structural cost headwinds. The levers: shop count expansion in under-penetrated catchments (current penetration of viable petrol forecourts is only ~35%, supermarkets ~20%, retail parks ~25%), evening daypart growth (9.4% of company-managed sales in 2025 vs 9.0% in 2024, fastest-growing daypart, driven by hot food and delivery), and grocery channel through Iceland and now Tesco (800 large stores plus 1,900 Tesco Express units from January 2026). The headwinds: National Living Wage compounding at 5–10% per year, and lease depreciation creep from estate growth. The arithmetic only works if shop additions and channel partnerships create incremental volume faster than wage costs eat margin — which is why the 2026–28 ROCE recovery thesis hinges on whether like-for-like volumes return to +3-4% as consumer confidence recovers.

The Playing Field

There is no clean comparable for Greggs in UK listed equities, which is itself part of the moat. The peer table below pulls the closest five — pizza delivery (Domino's UK), travel-food (SSP), pub estates (JD Wetherspoon), pub-and-hotel (Whitbread/Premier Inn) and global contract caterer (Compass Group) — and shows the spread of business models that all touch UK out-of-home eating without doing what Greggs does. The takeaway: Greggs sits between Domino's UK (high return on capital, asset-light franchise model, tiny revenue) and Compass Group (massive scale, low margin, huge return on capital) on the value chain, but is unique in combining vertical manufacturing with a high-street retail estate at scale.

The peer set reveals where the moat is real and where it is imaginary. The real edge is value at premium frequency: Greggs ranks number one for value in YouGov's BrandIndex across the entire UK quick-service-restaurant, coffee-shop and delivery sector — not number one in food-to-go, number one across all of QSR. That price perception is built on three structural advantages no peer can replicate at this footprint. First, vertical manufacturing — Domino's franchises bake locally, SSP buys finished product, Compass cooks on-site at corporate locations, but only Greggs runs five bakeries plus a national logistics fleet feeding 2,700 shops. Second, real-estate density — 2,739 UK shops gives Greggs a footprint roughly 4x Pret's UK estate and 3x Costa Coffee's owned shops, which means brand presence on virtually every high street, retail park and motorway service area. Third, a 33,000-person operating organisation tuned to a £3 average ticket; matching this requires either inheriting a similar baker (Cooplands, Pound Bakery, Bakers Plus — all far smaller) or rebuilding from scratch, which nobody is doing.

What the peer set also reveals is what Greggs is not. It is not Compass, whose 108% return-on-capital reflects an asset-light contract-catering model where the customer (a hospital, an airline, a corporate cafeteria) provides the kitchen; Greggs owns or leases every brick. It is not Domino's UK, whose 83% return-on-capital comes from a master-franchisor model where franchisees fund all the stores; Greggs runs ~75% of its estate on its own balance sheet. It looks more like Whitbread/Premier Inn — a fully-owned UK retail estate — except Whitbread's customer is a £100 hotel night and Greggs' is a £3 lunch, which makes Greggs much more transaction-intensive and far less weather-resilient than its margin profile suggests. The "good in this industry" benchmark is Domino's UK at the asset-light end and Compass at the global-scale end; Greggs sits in the awkward middle, defending its position with brand, vertical integration and footprint density rather than capital efficiency.

Is This Business Cyclical?

Yes — more than the 60-year track record of bakery growth would suggest. Greggs is exposed at three points: footfall (consumer disposable income and weather), wage inflation (UK labour-market policy), and capital-cycle timing (its own choice). The 2020 COVID year drove revenue down 30% to £811m and operating profit to a £7m loss; that demonstrated that a 2,200-shop high-street retailer with no delivery infrastructure dropped through 100% of operating leverage when shops physically closed. Since then management has built delivery (now 6.8% of mix) and grocery (Iceland + Tesco) as cyclical buffers, but the 2025 result is the more interesting cycle test: in a year of 6.8% sales growth, operating profit fell 4% because like-for-like volumes were only +2.4% (further softening to ~+1.6% in early 2026), wage inflation ran 8.3%, and the supply-chain investment programme front-loaded fixed costs. ROCE went from 20.3% to 16.0% in twelve months without a recession, on rising sales.

Three episodes carry teaching value. FY2013 saw operating margin compress from 7.2% to 5.2% as the company executed a then-painful estate transformation (closing in-mall bakeries, investing in shop refits) — a self-inflicted capital-cycle dent that took two years to reverse. FY2019 was the post-IFRS 16 jump: EBITDA margin appears to leap to 19.3% but that is largely the lease-accounting reclass; the genuine signal is that 2018–19 was the high-water mark for unit economics before Covid intervened. FY2020 was the binary shock: £811m revenue, operating loss, no dividend, but a quick recovery to record £153m profit in 2024 once the estate normalised. The current cycle, 2024-26, is the third lesson — capital-cycle plus weak consumer plus wage shock. The signature is that capex peaks at £287m in 2025 against £52m of FCF, drawing the £125m net cash position down to £46m, and is set to reduce to £200m in 2026 and £150–170m from 2027.

Where the cycle hits hardest is operating margin, not revenue. Demand for an affordable lunch is sticky — even in 2025 the food-to-go market overall lost 3.1% of visits while Greggs gained share — but the company has limited ability to flex its fixed cost base downwards when volumes soften. Wage and lease costs are largely contractual; food and packaging are partially hedged (about four months forward cover, 100% of 2026 electricity fixed) but the underlying commodity exposure to wheat, fats, dairy and pork is real. Working capital is structurally favourable: Greggs collects from customers (cash and card at the till) faster than it pays suppliers (standard terms), giving it a chronic net-current-liability position (£152m at year-end 2025, up from £67m). That working-capital float is a permanent funding source — but it also means a sales decline mechanically compresses cash availability faster than P&L because the float reverses.

The Metrics That Actually Matter

Forget P/E and forget gross margin — they are noise in this business. The five metrics below explain whether Greggs is creating value, and the 2025 results show why three of them are flashing yellow.

Underlying ROCE is the single most important number because it sits at the intersection of profit margin and capital intensity, and management has explicitly anchored its strategy on a ~20% target. Underlying ROCE was 16.0% in 2025 versus 20.3% in 2024, and management has guided that it will fall further in 2026 as the Derby and Kettering distribution centres come into the asset base before generating their associated profits. The mechanical recovery to ~20% requires three things to happen by 2028: capex falls from £287m to £150-170m, like-for-like sales return to +3-5%, and the new logistics capacity supports continued shop additions toward the 3,500-shop medium-term ambition.

Company-managed like-for-like sales is the cleanest read on whether the brand is winning or losing share. The +2.4% printed in 2025 was below internal expectations and weakened to +1.6% in the first nine weeks of 2026, well under the ~+5% the model needs to leverage operating costs. The market context matters: the broader UK food-to-go market lost 3.1% of visits in 2025 per Circana, so Greggs gained share (8.1% to 8.6% of food-to-go visits) — but absolute volume growth is what drives operating leverage, and 2.4% is not enough to absorb 5.6% LFL cost inflation.

Cash return on new shops (25% target, 30%+ at maturity) is the unit-economic anchor. As long as new openings deliver the target, capital allocated to estate growth compounds well above cost of capital and the strategy works. The risk is that in a softer consumer environment the maturation curve slows from two-three years toward four-five years, lowering the IRR on the £430k-per-shop investment.

Net shop openings (121 in 2025, ~120 planned for 2026) is the volume side of the growth equation. More than half of new openings are now in non-traditional locations — petrol forecourts, retail parks, transport hubs, supermarkets, university and hospital campuses — which the company calls "underrepresented catchments." Penetration data from the 2025 prelim shows just 35% of viable petrol forecourts and ~20% of viable supermarkets currently host a Greggs, against near-saturation in central London Underground and university/hospital sites. This is the runway for the medium-term 3,500-shop target; the question is whether the 25% cash ROI hurdle holds in less-trafficked locations.

Food-to-go visit share (8.6% in 2025, +50bps in a down market) is the credibility check on the brand. Greggs is now ranked number one at breakfast, number two at lunch, number three at snacking and number four at dinner and delivery in UK food-to-go. The dinner ranking is structural — three years ago dinner was barely a Greggs occasion, and pizza, hot savouries and Mac & Cheese have built it into a 9.4% daypart share — but the absolute weight of dinner in the overall food-to-go market is small relative to lunch, where competition (M&S, Pret, Subway, supermarkets, contract caterers) is intense.

The metrics to de-emphasise are gross margin (rangebound at 61–63% because of the manufacturing model — fluctuations there are mix and commodity noise) and EPS (heavily affected by IFRS 16 lease interest, exceptional items like the £14.1m 2024 disposal gain and the £4.5m 2025 VAT correction). Underlying diluted EPS was 122.8p in 2025, but the more relevant figure is operating cash inflow per share at 267.1p — up 4.6% — which is what funds dividends and reinvestment.

What I'd Tell a Young Analyst

This is a great brand executing a hard business model in a phase where the model is paying for its own growth, and the share price is reflecting the present rather than the through-cycle. Three things to watch.

First, the ROCE-recovery clock starts when capex stops. Management has guided capex from £287m (2025) to £200m (2026) to £150–170m (2027 onwards). When that landing is verified — likely at the H1 2026 result and again at the FY2026 prelim — the FCF picture transforms: from £52m in 2025 to potentially £200m+ by 2028 on the same revenue base. If you believe the guide, 2025 is the cycle low for FCF margin (2.4%) and 2027–28 normalises to 8–10%, which is what funds restored special dividends and buybacks (point 5 of the stated capital allocation policy).

Second, like-for-like sales is the swing factor — and the early-2026 print of +1.6% says the consumer headwind has not lifted. The 20% ROCE target needs underlying volumes to grow 3-4% per year; at +2% LFL the operating leverage simply does not arrive. Watch quarterly trading updates for any sign of volume recovery, and pay particular attention to the daypart mix (evening growth and delivery basket size are the structurally encouraging signals; lunch share is the at-risk number because that is where competition is most intense).

Third, do not confuse the brand moat with the capital moat. The brand moat is real and durable: 8.6% UK food-to-go visit share, number-one value perception, a vertically integrated supply chain that no peer can copy in under five years. But the capital moat is weak — Greggs owns its bakeries and depots and leases its shops, which means any volume softness drops through to operating profit hard, and the only way to grow is to put more capital out (every new shop is £430k of fitting plus a 25-year lease commitment). The thesis-changing event is not a brand failure (very unlikely) but a structural shift in UK out-of-home eating habits — GLP-1 weight-loss drugs reducing snack frequency, persistent real-wage compression keeping consumers at home, or a competitor (likely a supermarket meal-deal player rather than another bakery) breaking the value-perception lead. None of these is imminent, but each is a tail risk that the 2025–26 trading pattern has made marginally less academic.

The trade you can run against this name is patience: Greggs is a high-quality UK consumer compounder going through a self-inflicted capital cycle in an unfriendly consumer environment. If you believe in the medium-term 3,500-shop story and the ROCE recovery to ~20%, the right entry is during the period when the market is most worried about ROCE — which is now. If you do not believe management can recover ROCE because volume growth has structurally slowed, then 16% ROCE on a fully-priced consumer brand is mediocre and the dividend yield (~4.5%) is not enough to compensate. The next four prints — H1 2026, Q3 2026 trading update, FY2026 prelim and H1 2027 — will tell you which world you are in.

The Numbers

Greggs compounded revenue from £238M in 1996 to £2.15B in 2025 with net margins that, until this year, rarely left a 6–9% band — a remarkably durable bakery franchise built on company-owned vertical manufacturing. The stock has since been cut in half from its £33 peak because three things reversed at once in FY2025: a capex program that has doubled depreciation while FCF collapsed, an operating margin that slipped from 9.7% to 8.7%, and a net-cash cushion that has all but disappeared. The single metric most likely to rerate the stock is FY2026 operating margin — if management holds the 9%+ line while the new supply-chain capacity starts absorbing volumes, the multiple reopens; if margins drift again, this stays a value trap.

A. Snapshot

B. Quality scorecard — is this a business that survives?

The profile is a strong-moat retailer that is starting to show wear: growth and profitability still score top-decile, but balance-sheet strength has fallen into the 6/10 range as capex outpaces cash generation, and momentum is in the bottom third after a year of earnings downgrades. Altman Z of 3.5 still says "safe" — but it was above 7 as recently as FY2019 and is now the lowest since the financial crisis.

C. Revenue and earnings power — 20-year view

Revenue roughly tripled in the last decade and doubled since the pandemic — store count plus ticket growth. Operating income reached a new high in FY2024 at £195M but softened to £187.5M in FY2025, the first absolute decline in a non-pandemic year since 2013.

The FY2025 net margin compression (7.62% → 5.68%) is the sharpest ex-COVID move in the series — driven by higher D&A from the supply-chain build-out, rising interest expense on lease liabilities, and a tax rate that stepped up to 27%. Operating margin slipped less (9.70% → 8.72%) but is still the lowest since FY2018.

Recent half-yearly direction

Revenue still grew 6.8% in FY2025 — but H1 net income fell 16% year-over-year, and H2 gave back 23%. That's where the story broke: volume held, but cost leverage didn't.

D. Cash generation — are the earnings real?

Operating cash flow keeps setting new records — £337M in FY2025, a 5-year high — even as reported earnings slipped. That's IFRS 16 optics (lease payments sit below the OCF line) plus working-capital inflows; the usable cash story lives in free cash flow below.

This is the chart that explains most of the derating. Capex has quadrupled in four years — from £54M in FY2021 to £285M in FY2025 — as Greggs opens the Derby and Kettering distribution centres and expands Balliol Park and Amesbury. FCF has collapsed from £231M (FY2021) to £52M (FY2025), the lowest non-pandemic level in a decade. Trailing 5-year FCF/NI conversion is roughly 82% — still acceptable, but pre-2022 that number averaged above 110%.

E. Capital allocation

Greggs has been a disciplined but modest cash returner — a steady ordinary dividend plus occasional large specials (£40.9m paid as part of the £98m FY2022 distribution, and £56m of the FY2024 £107m). Buybacks are symbolic. The notable shift in FY2025: zero buybacks, and £25M of gross new debt to fund capex — the first external borrowing in the data series.

F. Balance sheet health

Cash has fallen from £199M at the post-pandemic peak to £71M, and the company took on its first external debt in the modern era during FY2025. Altman Z is still comfortably in the safe zone (above 3) but has dropped every year since 2021 — this is a genuine trajectory, not a blip.

G. Valuation — now vs its own 20-year history

The decisive chart. EV/EBITDA of 6.1x is a full 1.8x below the 20-year mean of 7.9x and well under the 5-year mean of 9.2x. On P/E the gap is similar — 14.1x vs 17.1x long-run average. The stock is now priced cheaper than at any point since the global financial crisis, outside of 2008 itself. That is either the right price for a business whose capex intensity has permanently stepped up, or a deep cyclical bargain.

H. Peer comparison

Greggs is the clear ROIC leader of this UK-listed food-service cohort at 10.5% alongside Compass — but trades at a far cheaper EV/EBITDA than Compass (6.1x vs 13.2x) and Whitbread (9.6x). Only Wetherspoon and Dominos sit lower, and both carry weaker margin structures and higher leverage (Net Debt/EBITDA 4.5x and 3.8x respectively).

Quality vs value — peer positioning

Upper-left is where you want to buy. Greggs and Dominos are both reasonably priced high-ROIC operators; Compass is the quality play but expensive; Whitbread is the value trap. Greggs is priced more like JDW (a lower-return pub operator) than like the best-in-class food-service peers — which is exactly the valuation gap worth closing.

I. Fair value and scenarios

Three independent lenses converge on a £20–£32 range:

1. Fair Value model (12-month): £34.57 — assumes a modest normalisation of margins and continued 6–8% top-line growth.
2. EV/EBITDA reversion: at the 20-year mean of 7.95x and FY2025 EBITDA of £345M, EV is £2,744M. Subtracting the £25M of bank debt and capitalising £70.8M of cash yields equity value of about £2,790M, or roughly £27.2/share — 66% above the current price.
3. FCF-based floor: at FY2025 FCF of £52M and a 5.5% required yield, equity is worth only about £940M or £9.2/share. This is the bear case if capex doesn't normalise.

Current £16.43 sits between bear and base — the market is pricing in that capex stays structurally elevated and margins stabilise at the FY2025 level, but not that either tailwind reasserts. The asymmetry favours the upside if FY2026 margins re-expand to the 9.5%+ region.

What the numbers say

The numbers confirm that Greggs is still one of the best-run UK consumer businesses by the measures that matter long-term: 20%+ ROE, 60%+ gross margin sustained for two decades, Altman Z still in the safe band, and a revenue base that has never meaningfully gone backwards outside a pandemic. They contradict the popular "structurally broken" narrative that drove the share price from £33 to £16 — cash flow from operations hit a record high in FY2025, the dividend was maintained, and the Fair Value discount is the widest in a decade. What to watch next: the H1 2026 operating margin print. If it lands above 9% with flat-to-down capex guidance, the multiple should close half the gap to the 20-year mean within twelve months; if margins drift lower while capex stays above £250M, the bear case at £9–10 becomes live.

The People Running Greggs

Greggs is a textbook FTSE 250 governance setup: an independent chair, a CEO promoted after twelve years inside the building, a long-serving chief financial officer, six independent non-executives, full UK Corporate Governance Code compliance, and a 97.85% advisory vote in favour of the latest pay report. The single asterisk on an otherwise quiet file is economic alignment — the entire executive team plus chair holds roughly 95,000 shares between them on a base of 102.3 million in issue, so the people running the bakery own roughly 0.09% of it. That is the lens through which to read everything below.

1. The People Running This Company

The board has nine directors at the time of the 2024 annual report — two executives, an independent chair, and six non-executives — all of whom the board itself classifies as independent on appointment. Roisin Currie was promoted from Retail and Property Director to chief executive in May 2022 after twelve years at Greggs and twenty earlier years at Asda; she was awarded a CBE and now sits as an independent non-executive director on the Howden Joinery board (her one permitted external directorship). Richard Hutton, who has run finance since 2006 and joined the board the same year, remained CFO through the FY2025 preliminary results signed in March 2026. Matt Davies, the former Tesco UK and Halfords chief executive, took the chair from Ian Durant on 2 August 2022.

Binder Error: Set operations can only apply to expressions with the same number of result columns

The FY2024 board attendance record was almost perfect: Currie, Hutton, Davies, Mills, Weedall and Elsarky all attended every one of seven board meetings; Ferry missed two following surgery; Rogers attended every meeting from her June appointment. The most interesting human-capital story sits not in the boardroom but in the audit committee chair seat. The original successor to Ferry, ex-WH Smith CFO Robert Moorhead, accepted the role in July 2025 then withdrew his candidacy in November 2025 after WH Smith launched an internal investigation into a £30 million accounting hole in its North American business — a black mark Moorhead was associated with by chronology if not by fault. Greggs reopened the search and announced Richard Smothers, formerly CFO of Greene King and Mothercare with fourteen years at Tesco, on 16 December 2025; he joins on 1 February 2026 and takes the audit chair from Ferry on 6 March 2026. The episode tested the nominations process and, on balance, the board acted decisively rather than defensively.

2. What They Get Paid

The single-figure totals are modest by FTSE 250 standards. The CEO earned £1.81 million in 2024 (up just 3% on 2023), the CFO £1.19 million (down 18% as the bonus dropped); fees for independent NEDs sit between £62k and £72k; the chair takes £261k. The 2025 base-pay rise of 3.5% for both executive directors was set proportionally below the 6.1%+ awarded to 84% of the workforce.

The pay is what it should be: variable. Currie's bonus paid only 53% of the maximum 125% of salary and the 2022 PSP grant vested at 66.8%, both reflecting that Greggs missed its very stretching like-for-like sales target despite delivering 5.5% LFL growth, then missed its evening-sales and delivery-sales targets. The Committee did not exercise discretion to raise vesting; it took the formula. The CEO-to-median pay ratio of 68:1 in 2024 has come down materially from 126:1 in 2019 and 98:1 in 2021, reflecting both subdued bonus outcomes and aggressive shop-floor pay rises (over 84% of the workforce got 6.1%+ in 2025). Pension contributions for the executive directors were aligned to the workforce rate (6%, rising to 7% in 2025) as far back as January 2024 — a real, not cosmetic, alignment that some FTSE 250 peers have not yet matched. The FY2024 remuneration policy was passed at the 2023 AGM with 97.89% support; the FY2024 implementation report received 97.85% at the 2024 AGM. Shareholders are not unhappy.

3. Are They Aligned?

This is where the governance file gets thinner. Total beneficial ownership across all named directors at the 28 December 2024 year-end was roughly 95,091 shares against 102,255,675 in issue — about 0.09% of the company. Royal London, Vanguard, BlackRock and Schroders each individually own fifty to sixty times more than the entire board.

The substantial-shareholder table tells the alignment story bluntly: Greggs is around 76–88% institutionally owned (estimates vary by source and year), with no single holder above 5%, no founder family stake, no controlling block, and effectively no hedge funds. Schroders and Royal London were notified at 4.96% and 4.94% respectively at 3 March 2025; BlackRock, JPMorgan and Silchester have all filed TR-1 notifications recently. The top sixteen institutions hold roughly half the share capital, which makes the AGM votes meaningful and the board genuinely accountable to professional money rather than to insiders.

Insider activity (limited disclosure). UK PDMR dealings appear via RNS as they happen; this run did not pull a structured PDMR feed, so the picture is incomplete. The signal from the press record is mixed but mostly mechanical:

Hutton's October 2024 sale of 65,000 shares at £28.51 was a one-day £1.85m disposal that coincided with him exercising long-dated PSP options that produced a gain of more than £1.9m in the year (FY2024 alone he exercised 17,268 + 20,906 = 38,174 PSP shares); against shares he holds 62,105 directly with vested-but-unexercised options on top, the trim looked like portfolio rebalancing rather than loss of confidence. His November 2025 sale of 7,438 shares at £15.71 — a price almost half what he had been selling at thirteen months earlier — is more telling, because it happened with the share down sharply on consumer-confidence headwinds. Chair Matt Davies put £20k of his own money into the stock at £16 in August 2025, a small but real bottoming-style buy. CEO Currie's October 2024 purchase of fourteen shares (£404) and her later twenty-nine-share purchase look like tokenistic SIP/SAYE participation, not conviction trades. Greggs now uses a 200%-of-salary minimum shareholding guideline and a post-employment holding rule; Currie sat at 124.5% of salary at year-end (still building toward 200% three years into the role) and Hutton at 401%.

Dilution and capital allocation. Share issuance is small and almost entirely employee-driven (PSP, SAYE, SIP). The 2024 AGM authorised the company to buy back up to 10.1 million ordinary shares (~10% of capital); that authority went unused at year-end and is up for renewal at the 2025 AGM. Cash returns have leaned on dividends rather than buybacks: 2024 distributed £106.8m including a 40.0p special dividend; the 2025 ordinary dividend was held flat at 69.0p as capex peaked at £287.5m for the Derby and Kettering distribution centres. Net cash sat at £45.8m at end-2025. Capital allocation has been disciplined and shareholder-friendly even as the consumer environment softened.

Related-party behaviour. The 2024 Annual Report states the Group has no contractual or other relationships with any single party essential to the business, and no related-party transactions were flagged in the audit committee review. The auditor (RSM UK Audit LLP, appointed 2021 after a tender) earned £24,450 in non-audit fees during 2024 — turnover-certificate work for shop landlords, equal to 7.8% of the audit fee. That ratio is well below the FRC's typical alarm threshold.

Skin-in-the-game: 4/10. The 200%-of-salary shareholding guideline plus a two-year post-employment holding period are best practice; the CEO is still building toward the threshold; the CFO is comfortably above it. But in absolute terms, the executives own a rounding error of the company. There is no founder stake, no promoter, no anchor. Alignment runs through PSP vesting and bonus mechanics — both of which have proven that they actually move (the 2024 bonus paid 53% not 100%, and PSP vested at 66.8% not 100%). The compensation system bites; the equity stake doesn't.

4. Board Quality

The board scores well on independence, attendance and the basic mechanics; less well on retail-operations depth outside the executive line.

The board structure is unusually clean for a UK retailer: every independent NED sits on every committee, attendance was 100% across the board for almost every member (Ferry's three absences are explained by surgery, fully recovered), the audit committee was formally evaluated by external facilitator Calibro Consulting in 2024 and rated as functioning well, and the FRC limited-scope review of the 2023 accounts produced no enforcement action. Nigel Mills is a credentialled SID with parallel SID seats at Persimmon and John Wood Group — a pattern that some governance hawks consider over-boarded but that Greggs's external evaluation accepted.

The expertise mix is genuinely diverse for a £2bn revenue bakery: a sitting FTSE 100 CFO (Ferry / soon Smothers), a multi-FTSE Chair (Davies), a global consumer marketing leader (Rogers), a senior HR specialist (Weedall), and a global consumer-goods veteran (Elsarky). The one gap a retail-investor might flag is genuine in-shop, food-on-the-go operations experience outside Currie herself; nobody on the NED bench is currently running a comparable hospitality estate. The chair has indicated 2025 board-development objectives that include validating "the operational structure is optimised towards continued achievement of the business plan" — code for owning that gap explicitly. Kate Ferry's six-year tenure ends within UK Code expectations; her departure plus Smothers's arrival means 2026 will see two newcomers on the audit committee, a meaningful refresh. The 2024 AGM passed every resolution including remuneration with 97%+ support, a sign that the institutional shareholder base is comfortable with the current setup.

The single residual flag is the Moorhead episode: the Nominations Committee, supported by Spencer Stuart, picked a candidate who then had to withdraw because his prior employer disclosed an audit problem under his watch. The board did the right thing in accepting the withdrawal and replacing him quickly with a credentialled alternative, but the original due-diligence process did not surface the WH Smith risk in time. Read it as a process near-miss rather than a governance failure.

5. The Verdict

The single thing most likely to upgrade the grade to A− is a sustained period of director buying at depressed prices (Davies's August 2025 £20k buy at £16 is a positive token; more would matter), Currie crossing the 200% shareholding threshold organically, and a clean transition of audit-chair responsibilities to Smothers in March 2026 with no further wobbles. The single thing most likely to downgrade it is any indication that the recent FY2025 VAT self-disclosure (£4.5m exceptional, self-identified and reported to HMRC) reflects systemic control weakness rather than a legacy clean-up — the audit committee's UK Code 2024 material-controls work, due to land in 2026, will be the test.

The Full Story

Greggs has been telling, in essence, the same story since October 2021: more shops, more dayparts, more channels, more efficiency, the same ROCE, the same dividend cover. For three years the numbers obliged — sales doubled from £1.2bn to £2.0bn between FY21 and FY24, the estate cleared 2,600, and FY24 produced a record £204m pre-tax profit. In FY25 the script finally cracked. Underlying pre-tax profit fell 9.4%, ROCE collapsed from 20.3% to 16.0%, and the share price has lost roughly half its value from the early-2024 peak. Management credibility on operational delivery (CEO transition, supply-chain builds on time and to budget, market-share gains) is intact. Credibility on the valuation-load-bearing promise — the October-2021 plan to "double sales over a five-year period" by 2026 — has quietly slipped: the phrase appeared verbatim in three consecutive annual letters and is absent from the FY25 prelims and CEO report. The current chapter is a margin-and-capital trough being sold as a temporary intersection of cycle and capex peak. The bull case requires both to break the right way at once.

1. The Narrative Arc

Six years, three distinct chapters: the Covid shock, the Currie-era acceleration, and the 2025 reset. The chart traces sales and reported pre-tax profit alongside the inflection events that re-set the company's narrative.

The longer view matters because it shows how unusual FY25 is. Greggs has compounded sales for three decades almost without interruption — only Covid produced an absolute revenue decline, and even FY13 (a margin reset under outgoing CEO Ken McMeikan, before Roger Whiteside refocused the chain on food-on-the-go) saw sales rise 4%.

The Whiteside era (CEO 2013–May 2022) is the prior chapter that built the platform: a deliberate transition out of traditional bakery into "food-on-the-go," the closure of the Twickenham bakery (finally sold in 2024 for a £14m exceptional gain), the 2018 vegan sausage roll moment that became a viral-marketing case study, and the structural margin step-up visible from FY15 (operating margin recovered from 5.2% in FY13 to 8.7% in FY15 and held above 8% every non-Covid year since). Roisin Currie inherited the playbook in May 2022 and has executed it without strategic deviation; what she has changed is the scale of the capex bet behind it.

2. What Management Emphasised — and Then Stopped Emphasising

Read the CEO and CFO letters chronologically and three patterns emerge: (i) the "double sales by 2026" line ran like a metronome from FY21 through FY24 and then disappeared; (ii) "delivery" was the breakout 2020/21 story, was downgraded to a "rebased" channel in FY23, and is now a steady ~6.8% of sales mix; (iii) "evening" arrived in FY22 as the next horizon and is the one growth pillar the 2025 letter still actively promotes.

The most telling cell is the top-right zero. The "double sales over a five-year period" framing — first articulated at the October 2021 Capital Markets Day, repeated in the FY22 prelim, repeated in the FY23 review ("two years on … we are very much on track"), and re-affirmed in Currie's FY24 letter ("In 2021, we set our sights on doubling sales by 2026 … sales are on track") — is conspicuously gone from the FY25 prelim and CEO report. Sales of £2,151m vs. a notional 2x of FY21's £1,230m would require £2,460m, a number FY26 will not reach at the guided LFL run-rate (1.6% in the first nine weeks). Management has not formally retired the goal; they have simply stopped saying it, which is the historian's most common tell.

Two other dropped emphases: delivery (a 2021 headline; a 2023 mea culpa — "with the benefit of hindsight, it is clear that some of our early success in the food delivery market was a reflection of temporary pandemic conditions"; now flat at 6.8% of mix) and special dividends (paid in 2021, 2023, and 2024; absent in 2025, with management instead reserving the right to use share buybacks for the first time as the cash position normalises). New emphases that have moved up the page are structural cost savings (£10.6m in FY24, £13.0m in FY25, with explicit commitment to scale this lever further) and ROCE-recovery framing — the 20% target appears repeatedly in 2024–25 prose precisely because the actual ratio is now four points below it.

3. Risk Evolution

The risk register is one of the cleanest documents Greggs publishes; it has changed in three significant ways across the period and one of them was just introduced in FY25.

Three movements are worth pausing on:

• Brexit dropped, pandemic muted, climate de-prioritised. All three were near top-of-page in FY20–FY22; by FY25 climate has been formally judged "not a principal risk within the time horizon of our current plans." Pandemic remains in the viability scenario (modelled as a 30% revenue hit in a hypothetical Q4 2026 lockdown), but the language is procedural rather than urgent.
• Cyber / IT and allergens are now top-of-page. The FY25 chair statement explicitly references "the well-publicised issues faced by other retailers" — a thinly veiled nod to the 2025 cyber incidents that hit large UK chains during the SAP S/4HANA migration year — and dedicates Board agenda time to allergen processes. This is a textbook example of risk language tracking peer events.
• A brand-new "Financial Liquidity" principal risk appeared in FY25. This is the first new principal risk added in five years, and it follows a year in which net cash fell from £125.3m to £45.8m and the company drew on its RCF for the first time (£25m drawn at year-end). The disclosure is benign on the surface but the timing — alongside peak capex — tells you what the Board is now actually worried about.

4. How They Handled Bad News

There have been three real "bad news" episodes in the period: the Covid loss in FY20, the FY24 H2 LFL miss, and the FY25 weather/consumer profit reset. Greggs has handled all three with the same playbook: name it, quantify it, attribute it (mostly) to external factors, then reassert the strategy. The honesty quotient varies.

Binder Error: Could not ORDER BY column "CASE  WHEN (("event" = 'FY20 Covid loss')) THEN (1) WHEN (("event" = 'FY23 delivery rebase')) THEN (2) WHEN (("event" = 'FY24 H2 LFL miss')) THEN (3) ELSE 4 END": add the expression/function to every SELECT, or move the UNION into a FROM clause.

The single quote that tells you most about Greggs' truth-telling style is the FY23 delivery climbdown: "with the benefit of hindsight, it is clear that some of our early success in the food delivery market was a reflection of temporary pandemic conditions." That sentence — written by a CFO who has been in seat since before IPO-era management norms changed — is unusually direct for a UK CEO/CFO letter and earns the company most of its honesty points. The FY25 letter, in contrast, contains no comparable mea culpa for either the doubling target or the FY25 ROCE pressure; the framing is "challenging market conditions … structural opportunities … our ability to weather these conditions." Where 2023 used hindsight to be candid, 2025 used it to externalise.

5. Guidance Track Record

Greggs guides on five things with any specificity: input cost inflation, net new shop openings, capex, ROCE, and the implied sales/profit trajectory through the doubling target. The track record is mixed: cost-inflation calls have been credible; estate growth has consistently met or exceeded; capex has run hot at the top of guided ranges; ROCE has now missed materially.

Binder Error: Could not ORDER BY column "CASE  WHEN ((outcome = 'Met')) THEN (1) WHEN ((outcome = 'Beat')) THEN (2) ELSE 3 END": add the expression/function to every SELECT, or move the UNION into a FROM clause.

Credibility score: 7/10. The deduction is concentrated in two places. First, the doubling-by-2026 ambition was repeated four years running, then quietly dropped in the year it became unattainable — the company has yet to formally release the goal or replace it with a new medium-term target. Second, the FY24 ROCE-dilution guidance ("modest" 2025/26 dip) understated the actual FY25 outturn (430 bps drop in one year) by a material margin. The 7/10 rather than something lower reflects the fact that Greggs has hit the cost inflation, capex envelope, and shop-opening guidance with unusual precision — and that the management team disclosed the FY24 LFL miss and FY23 delivery climbdown without analyst prompting.

6. What the Story Is Now

The current chapter of the Greggs story has three components — one bullish, one bearish, one to be determined.

De-risked. The supply-chain build that defines this chapter is essentially complete. The Balliol Park fourth line was commissioned in 2024 (+35% savoury rolls/bakes capacity). The Birmingham and Amesbury radial distribution centres were extended by end-2024 (+300 shops of capacity). Derby and Kettering have both been delivered "on time and on budget" — Derby goes live in H2 2026, Kettering in H1 2027. Together the network is now sized for ~3,500 shops, against 2,739 today — six to nine years of estate runway at recent opening rates. Capex peaked in FY25 at £287.5m and steps down to ~£200m in FY26 and £150–170m from FY27. Pension de-risking is done (Aviva buy-in completed FY24). The Twickenham legacy site is sold. The dividend has been held flat at 69.0p — explicitly during the investment phase, with the 2x-cover policy intact. None of these are the kind of items that go wrong from here.

Stretched. The FY26 guide is unusually candid: "profits at a similar underlying level to 2025, with any year-on-year improvement contingent on a recovery in the consumer backdrop." Translated: the in-year earnings line depends on a macro variable Greggs does not control. ROCE is 16.0% against a stated 20% target, with the FY25 MD&A explicitly warning ROCE will fall further in 2026 as Derby fixed costs land and stabilise in 2027 before recovering. The doubling-sales target has been silently retired without replacement. The free-cash position — net cash of just £45.8m, with £25m drawn on the RCF — is the lowest in years, and the 3% of revenue net cash policy means little buyback capacity in 2026 even if the option is now formally on the table. LFL growth in the first nine weeks of 2026 is 1.6%, below the 2.4% FY25 outturn.

To be determined. Whether Greggs is a structurally better business at the end of this capex cycle than it was going in. The bull case is straightforward: a 2,739-shop estate growing into 3,500-shop capacity, with App-loyalty share up from 8% to 27% of transactions, evening daypart still the fastest grower, market-share gains in a shrinking market (Greggs +50 bps to 8.6% while market visits fell 3.1%), and structural cost savings scaling from £10.6m to £13.0m year-on-year. The bear case is equally legible: gross margin has compressed every year for four years (from 63.6% in FY21 to 61.5% in FY25), the ROCE recovery requires both volumes and a Derby/Kettering ramp the company has never done at this scale, and the share price has spent the last 18 months telling you the market does not believe the recovery is automatic.

What to believe vs. discount. Believe management on operational delivery — the supply-chain build, the shop pipeline, the cost-savings programme, and the App-loyalty traction are happening as described and are independently verifiable from the trading updates. Discount the implicit promise that ROCE returns to 20% on a normal calendar; that requires both market recovery and capacity utilisation to compound in the right direction at the same time, neither of which is in management's control. The single most informative item to track from here is FY26 H2 like-for-like sales: if it stays in the 1–2% range, the Greggs story is structurally lower-margin than the post-Covid years implied; if it accelerates back through 4%, the doubling target was always a question of timing, not feasibility.

What's Next

Greggs is already past its most dangerous tape (the January 2025 profit warning) and into the show-me phase. The January 2026 trading update already set expectations low for FY26 — "profits at a similar underlying level to 2025" — so the next 3–6 months are less about whether the market learns something new and more about whether the first-half print proves the bottom is in.

The market is watching two numbers and two prices. The numbers are H1 FY26 operating margin and H1 LFL. The prices are the weekly close above £17.50 (reclaims the 100-day, breaks the sequence of lower highs since January 2025) and the daily close below £15.00 (re-opens the July 2025 £14.07 low). Everything else — AGM, Derby commissioning, Q1 update — is either low-information or a leading indicator for those four prints.

For / Against / My View

For

The vertical-integration moat is still showing up in the numbers. Greggs' 61.5% gross margin is roughly double the listed UK food-service cohort (Compass 33%, SSP 47%, Domino's 46%) and has been stable across two decades including through inflation shocks. That is the single best evidence the business has something competitors cannot replicate without owning their own bakeries.

Valuation compression has reached levels only 2008 produced. EV/EBITDA of 6.1x is a full 1.8 turns below the 20-year mean (7.9x) and well under half the 5-year average; the quality-score / fair-value framework flags a discount that on the last comparable occasion (2008–2009) preceded a 5x move over the next five years. Cheap is not the same as attractive, but this is the deepest discount the business has printed outside a genuine crisis.

The capex-to-FCF flip is dated, not theoretical. Capex went from £54M in FY21 to £285M in FY25; management has now explicitly called "past the peak of investment," Derby comes online mid-2026, Kettering in 2027. If the build lands on schedule — and the guidance-track record on physical projects has been clean — then 2027 FCF should rebuild toward the £150–200M corridor that used to fund specials, which is what the current 4.1% yield is not pricing.

Pay discipline and balance-sheet conservatism limit downside. Bonus paid out at 53% of max (not 85%) when targets weren't met, no dilution, £47M net cash even after the capex peak, Altman Z still 3.5. This is not a company that will be pushed into value-destructive action if the slowdown extends — the cash return policy bends before the strategy does.

Against

The "doubling sales by 2026" anchor has been quietly dropped. It dominated CEO letters through 2024 and is absent from the FY25 letter — replaced by vaguer "medium-term opportunities" language. Greggs would need £2.46bn in 2026 against a base of £2.15bn plus flat-profit guidance; the math no longer works, and the way management has handled the walk-back (soft fade rather than formal retraction) is the weakest chapter in an otherwise clean credibility history.

ROCE compression is the central unanswered question. The drop from 32% (FY24) to 21% (FY25) is partly mechanical (distribution-centre capex sitting in the denominator pre-revenue) but the margin piece is not mechanical — it's UK wage inflation, National Insurance (~£45M annual cost step-up), and the reality that Greggs has almost no pricing power above its value perception. If ROCE settles in the high teens rather than rebuilding to the high-20s, the 25x-type multiple the stock used to earn does not come back.

Skin in the game is a rounding error. The CEO holds ~£0.5m of stock against £1.8m annual comp; all insiders combined hold roughly 0.1% of the company; the only recent open-market buy by management was a £20k token from the Chair. Combined with the CFO succession turnover and Audit Chair handover inside 18 months, the people running the business are not personally invested at a level where this looks like anything other than professional stewardship — which is fine in a calm market but thin if a second leg down tests governance resolve.

The tape says the market does not believe the recovery yet. Three years of relative underperformance vs the UK broad market, price 27% below the 52-week high, four of the last five high-volume days were panic sells, and the 50-day SMA is still sub-200 with the death cross unresolved. Technicals can be wrong, but the weight of the evidence is a counter-trend rally inside a broader stall, not a new leg.

My View

Slight lean against, but it is a close call and I would not fight the other side hard. The valuation and the capex-flip arguments are real — 6.1x EV/EBITDA on a 20%-plus ROCE business with £47M net cash is not a set-up that usually produces bad five-year returns. What holds me back is the combination of the quietly-abandoned doubling target, the fact that H1 FY26 margin is the load-bearing print and it is four months away, and a tape that is clearly not ready to pay up in front of it. I'd rather wait and pay more above £17.50 with a 9%-plus H1 margin in hand than average in here and be the shareholder who finds out in August that 8.7% was the ceiling, not the floor. The one data point that would flip the view now rather than later is an early-Q2 LFL print materially above 3% — that would make the cyclical-pause reading far more credible than the structural-reset reading, and would make the current price the cheap option it looks like on paper.

What the Web Says About Greggs

The web reveals a stock deep in a sentiment drawdown that the historical filings don't fully capture: Greggs was the worst-performing stock on the FTSE 250 in 2025, down roughly 43%, and hit its lowest share price since the pandemic in July 2025 on a first-half profit miss. Yet the tape is split — J.P. Morgan initiated coverage in December 2025 with an Overweight rating and a 2,110p Dec-2027 target (implying ~35% upside), while Jefferies downgraded to Hold and slashed its target from 2,500p to 1,610p in February, and Berenberg cut its target from 2,170p to 2,090p in March 2026. The single most important off-filing signal: Greggs has peaked capex (£287.5m in 2025), guided that it will fall to ~£200m in 2026 and £150–170m from 2027, which management explicitly says will unlock capacity for additional returns to shareholders — the setup for a classic re-rating if like-for-like sales stabilise.

What Matters Most

#6 — FY2025 trading: 6.9% sales growth but 9.4% profit decline. Total sales reached £2.15bn (+6.8%), like-for-like sales in company-managed shops were +2.4%, franchise LFL was +4.3%, and the estate expanded to 2,739 shops (+121 net). However, underlying PBT fell 9.4% to £171.9m on cost inflation and strategic investment. Greggs guided 2026 profit "similar underlying level to 2025," dependent on a consumer recovery. Source: Proactive Investors, 3-Mar-2026.

#7 — Long-term whitespace reaffirmed: >3,000 UK shops. Management explicitly stated it sees "a clear long-term opportunity for significantly more than 3,000 UK shops," with 2026 guidance of ~120 net openings (though down from an earlier 145 plan). Evening trading (9.4% of mix, fastest-growing daypart) and delivery (+8.1% to 6.8% of sales) continue to scale. The Greggs Rewards app is now scanned in 26.7% of transactions (up from 20.1% in 2024). Source: Proactive Investors / AskTraders / TipRanks.

#9 — Institutional ownership concentrated; notable hedge-fund rotation. Top holder Silchester International disclosed a 5.00% stake (27-Nov-2025). Schroders holds 4.69%, National Bank Financial 3.98%, MFS International 3.46% (net added 1.01m shares, +39.9%), Ninety One added 580k (+33%). Offsetting: Royal London, Fiduciary Management, and JPMorgan Securities (market-maker) fully exited; BlackRock cut by 54.9%. Institutions own ~88% of the float. Source: FT/FactSet, 31-Dec-2025.

#10 — Moorhead board situation and governance churn. Robert Moorhead (ex-WH Smith CFO) was announced as incoming non-executive director / audit committee chair, but Greggs' filings show a 19-Nov-2025 "Board Update" noting a withdrawal of a Non-Executive Director candidacy, followed by a 16-Dec-2025 appointment of a different NED. Sarah Dickson is Company Secretary / General Counsel. Matthew Davies is Independent Non-Executive Chairman. Source: FinancialReports.eu filings feed.

Recent News Timeline

Analyst Targets — The Divide

Consensus rating is Hold (MarketBeat: 0 strong sell, 1 sell, 6 hold, 8 buy, 5 strong buy across 20 analysts). The ~500p range between JPM's bull case (2,110p) and Jefferies' base (1,610p) reflects genuine debate over whether 2025 weakness is cyclical (weather, inflation, consumer squeeze) or structural (UK saturation, GLP-1 demand destruction).

What the Specialists Asked

Insider Spotlight

Roisin Currie (CEO). Appointed May 2022. Internal promotion from Retail & Property Director — a shop-floor operator, not a finance CEO. Total comp £1.81m (36% salary / 64% variable). Personal ownership 0.033%. Her 14-share October 2024 purchase is symbolic alignment only. Simply Wall St has twice flagged pay-growth caution.

Richard Hutton (CFO). Long-tenured CFO. Two material sells within 13 months: £1.85m at 2,851p and £117k at 1,571p. The timing (both near or after highs on a price scale that subsequently declined 43%) reads as prudent diversification, not a conviction signal. No corresponding buys.

Matthew Davies (Independent Non-Executive Chair). £20k purchase at 1,600p on 20-Aug-2025 — a modest but real commitment at a price within 14% of the eventual 52-week low. Worth tracking for further adds.

Governance snapshot. Board churn: a 19-Nov-2025 "Board Update" noted a withdrawn NED candidacy; a 16-Dec-2025 announcement confirmed a different NED appointment. Robert Moorhead (ex-WH Smith CFO) is signalled as incoming audit-committee chair. Tamara Rogers joined as NED in 2025 with FTSE-100 marketing experience. Aggregate insider ownership remains under 1% of issued share capital (~£1.7–3.0m) — standard for UK plcs, not a "founder-aligned" story.

Industry Context

UK food-to-go is fragmented but Greggs leads. The UK bakery sector has over 4,000 independent operators; Greggs' 19.6% breakfast-market share makes it the single largest player, ahead of McDonald's in morning occasions. Breakfast contributes ~20-24% of group revenue by volume.

Competitive pressure is intensifying from two sides.

1. QSR chains broadening breakfast/snack menus — McDonald's and Pret a Manger are explicit competitive threats called out in SWOT coverage.
2. Structural demand risk from GLP-1 weight-loss drugs — Jefferies' downgrade thesis is that the most-frequent users of chains like Greggs are disproportionately exposed to the Ozempic/Mounjaro consumer shift. This is novel and unprovable from historical data, but has become an embedded part of the bear case.

Broader UK hospitality backdrop is weak. FT headlines across Q1-2026 paint a gloomy sector — "No end in sight for restaurant and pub pain" (19-Feb-2026), "UK restaurants offer deep discounts in 'last resort' to lure spend-shy diners" (1-Feb-2026), "Upmarket tastes leave UK high street coffee chains out in the cold" (17-Jan-2026). Greggs' over-index to value positioning is a defensive feature in this environment, but consumer-spend sensitivity is a headwind.

ESG / sustainability is a differentiator. Carbon intensity down 41.8% since 2019; net-zero target by 2040; on 13-Apr-2026 Greggs raised its 2030 sustainability ambitions after hitting key interim ESG milestones. Packaging recyclability, renewable energy use, and 45 Outlet shops (affordability format) have been expanded.